Vettel Vs Hamilton

Vettel Vs Hamilton Die besten Fahrerpaarungen aller Zeiten

Sollten Sebastian Vettel und Lewis Hamilton tatsächlich Teamkollegen werden, wäre das wohl eine der besten Fahrerpaarungen aller Zeiten. Form, Fakten, Frauen: In dieser Saison könnte es endlich zum heiß ersehnten Duell zwischen Sebastian Vettel und Lewis Hamilton kommen. SPORT1 mit. Bei den Wettanbietern ist jedoch Titelverteidiger Lewis Hamilton knapp favorisiert​. SPORT1 will es wissen und vergleicht die beiden Erzrivalen. Das Duell Vettel. Rennleiter Charlie Whiting bewertet den Zweikampf zwischen Sebastian Vettel und Lewis Hamilton als Rennunfall - Vettel: Schaden viel. Das Duell Sebastian Vettel vs. Charles Leclerc beschäftigt die F1 in Japan. Lewis Hamilton sieht bei Ferrari ein klares Muster. Kritik an Charles.

Vettel Vs Hamilton

Sebastian Vettel wollte in Monza einen Angriff auf die WM-Führung von Lewis Hamilton machen. Doch es blieb nur Rang 4 nach einer. Mehr Interesse, steigende Einschaltquoten: Der Zweikampf von Sebastian Vettel und Lewis Hamilton wirkt auch wie eine PR-Runderneuerung für die Formel 1. Das Duell Sebastian Vettel vs. Charles Leclerc beschäftigt die F1 in Japan. Lewis Hamilton sieht bei Ferrari ein klares Muster. Kritik an Charles. Alle Formel 1-Artikel. Jetzt suchen. Zum Motorsport-Total Hotel Special Club. Ein Punkt fehlte noch. Doch die Chancen standen schlecht. Wir arbeiten am Start auch als Team zusammen, wenn ich auf Pole bin oder Valtteri", so der Jährige. Whiting: Vettel vs. Ich habe mein Auto nur ein bisschen beschädigt. No mention of Hamilton driving an uncompetitive car for the click half of ? This is also the season people use to claim that Hamilton beat Alonso as his teammate. But Hamilton did have a better season and they both got to drive all year. Hamilton's should not be forgotten nor should Cl 2020 18 and Kimi's We rely on advertising to help fund our award-winning journalism. Hamilton manages to be Massa by one point for the championship. But I didn't. Shit happens. Neither is better in every aspect.

Vettel Vs Hamilton Video

Formel 1. Die Go here empfiehlt. Doch die Entscheidung fiel erst im Saisonfinale von Interlagos. Eine solche Fahrerpaarung birgt absoluten Zündstoff. Dank here Sieges von Jenson Button reichte https://awesomewalls.co/online-casino-spiele-kostenlos-ohne-anmeldung/beste-spielothek-in-detzeln-finden.php zum Titel. Die Fans hatten den Zeigefinger offenbar satt. Sebastian Vettel wollte in Monza einen Angriff auf die WM-Führung von Lewis Hamilton machen. Doch es blieb nur Rang 4 nach einer. Mehr Interesse, steigende Einschaltquoten: Der Zweikampf von Sebastian Vettel und Lewis Hamilton wirkt auch wie eine PR-Runderneuerung für die Formel 1.

He would have easily gotten 2nd if not for this. Vettel was fast and all due to his confidence in the car and brakes, but there was another car that was as fast as him that day that did not use Brembo.

It was the McLaren of Lewis Hamilton. Also don't forget that Vettel was using a dry setup in qualifying and the race while mostly everyone behind him was on a wet setup.

The other factor is that at the time, Red Bull were exploiting a rules loophole that allowed Newey to work for a "consulting" firm they set up and "sell" both teams the design.

The and Red Bull and Toro Rosso were functionally identical cars except for the engines. Sure, neither was world-beating at the time, and winning in one was still an upset and an impressive feat, but it's not like now where Red Bull has all the advantages and STR is something of a minnow team.

Even as a Vettel fan I think this is completely useless. You can't really know who's definitively better than the other unless you somehow get both of them in an amazing car for maybe 3 seasons or so.

Not really, you need both team mates to adapt to the current regulations and the team equally. One might be better at quickly changing racing style, but ultimately isn't as good a racer when both settle.

Or someone may struggle with a new team routine ect. At the end of last year Hamilton and Rosberg were considered somewhat equally, now?

Much less so. One season is good, three seasons and a rule change is much much better. One year is enough.

The margin between Nico and Lewis wasnt big - therefore, for Nico and Lewis - one year isnt enough. You dont need another year to see if Vettel is better than Kimi.

This years margin is big enough. We don't need another season for Kimi because he has been consistently beaten for the last few years by Fernando.

However he could be equal and just had a crappy year otherwise. Are you telling me you got consistent grades every year in School?

Shit happens. You can't really compare them. All of whom are considered very strong drivers.

Vettel has avoided comparison to top drivers in identical machinery and flat out got beaten by the strongest driver he's ever faced.

This is the best response to this Vettel fanboy. Vettel will probably not face a strong teammate for a long time since he's at Ferrari.

Again, the claim of besting Alonso is shaky. Good on him for tying Alonso who's an awesome driver and one of the best on the grid. Button and Rosberg, while great drivers, is a bit like using Vettel besting Webber or Bourdais as some large achievement.

Good, but not spectactular to have done so. The thing is Hamilton has been compared against the best on the grid. Vettel has had average drivers and the one time he faced a strong driver he got thrashed.

I like both of them. I hated Vettel when his car was clearly better than everyone else's, and everyone said he's the best driver of all time.

He's had an amazing season and has been so much fun to watch. And now I'm bored of watching Hamilton win, even though I was so bummed that his Mclaren and the team let him down so many times over the years.

Both are great drivers and are great at different things. Neither is better in every aspect. Even if they were on the same team, and one was faster, you couldn't say conclusively he's better.

Maybe some day we'll see it. Last year Vettel looked pretty weak compared to Ricciardo. Nobody's ever made Hamilton look weak.

Even the years where Button beat or came close to him, Hamilton had epic failures from his team again and again.

How can you think Vettel didn't perform better than Hamilton in easily Hamilton's worst season or that Hamilton performed better than Vettel in easily Vettel's worst?

Anyway, I don't understand this fixation with determining who is the outright best driver through extremely dubious analyses such as this.

Just get over the fact that you won't have a definitive answer unless they are teammates. But don't you see? Ignoring both of those seasons due to dominance equals out exactly like counting the.

Under your metric does. You only have to look at Alonso tooling around at the back right now to get that, but those gulfs aren't always so obvious if you're not looking carefully enough - take , where Massa and Raikkonen ran close to Alonso, but they've both been in the same car as him and But the other big problem with this is that you write like you started with a conclusion and sought to justify it.

For example:. Yet the previous year, Kimi Raikkonen beat Fernando Alonso to the championship by one point.

I don't hear you saying "that's right, folks. Why not? That's just one place where the analysis gives way to opinion - and is subjugated by it, in fact, as it willfully ignores the similarity to the previous year.

Given such an example though, the reader wonders if you similarly interpret all the data in a way that's favourable to your opinion, and feels they might be justified in discarding the entire analysis.

No, I'm sorry, what you said about was wrong. Lewis had the best season of any rookie, ever, and regardless of how shit Seb's car was, you can't safely assume he'd perform as well.

As a matter of fact, I think Kamui Kobayashi had a better than Vettel, he was just in a worse car, so there is no fair comparison.

Vettel didn't even drive the whole season and their cars were leagues apart so no viable comparison could be made between them.

Hamilton did have a great rookie year, no doubt. But this isn't about who had the best rookie year and there was no way to compare their performance fairly that year.

And is not counted toward anything for Vettel. So not sure where you even get the Kamui comparison. Vettel dominated that year and you'd say Kamui had a better run?

I always find it amusing when people engage in endless debates on who is better than who. I never waste my time on that, you can always take the numbers and manipulate them to back your opinion - basically passing opinions as facts.

If i follow your logic i will come to the conclusion that Kvyat who is beating Riciardo, who has beaten fair and square Vettel in the same car, is 'the better driver".

Read the season, no mention of Hamilton's absolute pig of a car for the first half of the season.

I love how some people think of themselves as "expert" pundits. It's good for a laugh if anything. Like those websites were anyone can be a "journalist".

In no way did I think or assume any such thing. But data and reasoning was asked of me, so I took the time to give it. So reply to that person, it's called a discussion.

This is just the result of trawling wikipedia and presenting it as something in depth to people who didn't ask for it.

Also why are you giving Vettel ? Hamilton came within 20 points of the title in a drastically slower car.

Reb Bull was the most dominant car ever in terms of pace. They regularly out qualify the field by more than a sec.

In today's money that's like Mercedes showing up with an hp engine while everyone else is making It only lost two races it entered in '61, both to Moss, both on circuits where skill was far more important than power.

A blind rookie won the first three F1 races he ever entered two non-championship, and his championship debut in a RB6 not in the top 20 is nonsense, it was just as fast relative to the opposition as the RB7.

Agree even Stefano and Brawn came out saying that the Ferrari was the better car at the start of the season and the Lotus was best at preserving it's tyres.

Ranking in all-time dominant cars can certainly be debated - whatthefat's model analyzes results and driver comparisons without taking laptimes, circumstances, and fluctuations in driver ability into account.

The Ferrari was undoubtedly a much quicker car than the McLaren. The relative performances of Alonso, Massa, and Raikkonen that year compared to years they were in the same car rather cement that.

But by how much? This was a fairly consistent gap from through , so it's probably pretty representative. Raikkonen's deficit to Alonso in qualifying last year was a full half a second, although Raikkonen's been driving really shitty the last couple of years.

In , Q3 was started with varying fuel loads, so I've looked at both Q2 run on equal, low fuel and Q3 times in case of something like one team starting consistently heavier than the other.

Minus indicates quicker. Over the course of the season, Massa, who never got closer than 2. And Raikkonen was quicker.

This gives an indication that the F was, well, roughly three tenths of a second quicker per lap than the McLaren, at least on average in qualifying.

Just the car on its own. If Alonso and Massa the weaker qualifier, on average about half a tenth to a tenth behind Raikkonen had swapped cars that year, their Q3 times modified correspondingly, Fernando would have taken 13 poles out of 16 Q3s he broke down once.

Kimi would have taken one more. Three tenths of a second a lap and 14 poles from 17 races is a fairly dominant car. Sure, it's significantly less than Mercedes have, and depending on the year, a little less than Red Bull had, but it's also only 16 on the list, and those half-second-plus cars are all in the top So I wouldn't argue position on fat's ranking, but I would absolutely claim that it was an extremely good car.

Depending on converting those poles to wins and Alonso on pole in a car with three tenths in its pocket, I'm NOT betting against him , it could absolutely be dominant.

You cannot predict things like that. No one in the season thought the ferrari was substantially faster than the mclaren.

If you go back to Raikkonen was considered arguably the best driver in formula 1. Alonso might have been a bit better, but i highly doubt he would've taken 14 poles from 17 races in the ferrari.

The car was simply not that quick, especially around mid season when they were unable to use their wind tunnel and were losing the development race to mclaren until the france updates came in.

I'm sorry but i do not agree with that at all. I threw Raikkonen in as a check and it jived. It's pretty likely that Kimi was never really that much better than Massa or Bottas - probably a little, because he's definitely not driving to that standard today, but not much.

The McLarens and Ferraris he drove were really just bloody good cars. I cannot remember now where i read it, but several years ago someone did an analysis of the car performances in , and they found that ferrari had the fastest car in 10 tracks, whereas mclaren was faster in 7 of them.

It's always impossible to tell if a serious injury affects a driver's speed - Piquet's certainly did, but Hakkinen did his best work after his.

However, one of Massa's best years against Alonso was , and he's holding up very well against Bottas, who people talked about so much as a rising star.

So it seems he's still driving at least very well. If he was affected significantly, that would seal that the F was actually equal to the McLaren on average, but it's really hard to know without access to Ferrari's data from years either side of the accident.

If we assume that Massa was slowed a lot by his injury, it puts the McLaren and Ferrari at rough equality, but buggers up driver rankings a bit.

The chief problem is Massa himself, who hasn't been considered to be at the very top of the pile.

He had a fairly average few first years, even losing his race seat for a year due to crashes, and was picked as a replacement for Barrichello - a clear 2.

He was pretty much trounced by Schumacher, although he did learn and improve a lot that year. But he immediately turned around and consistently matched Raikkonen for 2.

On their relative form from , there's no way that should have happened. And so, yes, Kimi had great performances at McLaren. He was probably considered the second best on the grid going into '07, if only because he hadn't won a WDC while Alonso had two.

But then he couldn't convincingly beat Massa. It fits far better if Raikkonen was fast but a little flattered by his Neweymobiles, and Massa took a few years to improve his skills, and they met in the middle.

I don't see how else their consistent equal performance is explained. One season, sure, but not basically three in a row.

Given this, it makes sense that Massa did recover pretty much fully from the injury - if he had not, then without the injury he would have very closely matched Alonso for sure in his strongest overall season of the four, before team orders and being relegated to official 2 again broke his spirit , and probably been a lot closer in the other three.

And given how Alonso has proven repeatedly that he's just in a class of his own, that seems unlikely. Massa's very good, and had his really great days, but matching Alonso to that extent doesn't scan.

As for the cars, obviously some tracks suited one or the other better, as they do today - see even Mercedes, who have a SECOND or so in hand some of the time, but haven't won Hungary in two otherwise crushing years, or this year's Singapore particularly.

Many factors can overcome even a very big car advantage - Italy '08 or Spain '12 come to mind. Still, those comparisons were probably made with the drivers included.

Which means that the faster Ferrari with slower drivers, and slower McLaren with faster drivers in the base case were statistically tied, and then a track more suited to one or the other would break the tie.

Everything still points to it being a very different season if all the drivers had been equal. They still had a significant race pace advantage.

It was regularly half a second per lap, often more than that. Especially when you compensate for the drivers.

I don't believe Mark Webber would be anywhere near as fast as Alonso, yet go watch Hungary and see him put 1 second per lap on Alonso to win.

The amount of "passion" after Malaysia caused a chemical change in OP's brain. That chemical change made him see things differently.

Why didn't you count 11 and 13 in Vettel's favour? Those were one of the best seasons by a driver ever.

He outscored his teammated by and points respectively. Also, was just awful by Hamilton. No mention of Hamilton driving an uncompetitive car for the first half of ?

While Vettel was battling for wins at the front Why does it matter that Vettel should be seen as better? Driver metrics are difficult to compare, and ultimately who cares if one is better or not, it's up to the history books and zeitgeist to determine who's the "best.

I'm not a Vettel fan because he's the best, which is questionable, just as supporters of Bottas, Ricciardo or Button don't support those drivers because they're somehow objectively the best.

We support drivers who resonate with us and whom we can relate to. I know we laugh at him now, but Villeneuve also took the title down to the last race in his rookie season.

But it's very rare rookies are as well prepped and put into a top team as JV and LH. So throwing around "best rookie ever" status is always contentious.

Yea like as if you can find a rookie who can beat a two time world champion just about every year. This is why fanboys never stop fighting in f1 there is no way of comparing drivers unless they are teammates and there is always the escuse that the losing driver had an off year.

Well, first of all, thanks Comradio for the effort, nice read. But the impression I got from reading this is that both are equal drivers.

Both have what it takes to be a champion, they have that special "killer" instinct you need to out perform the rest there are more drivers on the grid that have that instinct.

Hamilton fan here. I agree, if Vettel was in the W06 now against Hamilton, he will most likely win the championship. Look at how close he's been with the Mercs in points in what is an inferior car.

Mainly because of Merc's screw-ups, Singapore, Malaysia, and all of Rosberg's retirements. Also he is no where near Hamilton on points still and that's because the gap between 1st and 3rd is 10 points.

But the gap between 2nd and 3rd is only 3 points, which is why he is closer to Rosberg. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

All rights reserved. Want to join? Log in or sign up in seconds. Submit a new post. Submit a new text post. Get an ad-free experience with special benefits, and directly support Reddit.

Welcome to Reddit, the front page of the internet. Become a Redditor and join one of thousands of communities. Hamilton had the best rookie season of any driver in F1 history, though.

However, in the end. Hamilton had a great rookie year. Conclusion: No real comparison can be drawn between Hamilton and Vettel during the season.

But good on Lewis. No points awarded in the head to head here though. Hamilton manages to be Massa by one point for the championship.

That's right, folks. But both Hamilton and Vettel decisively beat their teammates. Conclusion: Again, no real viable comparisons can be made between the two this year as they are both in entirely different scenarios and cars.

Hamilton finishes behind Webber, Barrichello, Vettel, and Button. Not to mention, well ahead in the points.

So has to go to Vettel on merit. But it's Vettel who does, coming from 3rd to 1st in the standings in one race. He handily beats everybody including Hamilton.

But with that kind of car, it should be expected and not a surprise. And this is a season that counts in this head to head battle.

The one non Mercedes pole? That's right, Sebastian Vettel in Singapore. Have fun!! Want to add to the discussion?

Post a comment! Create an account. Good F1 fan. Like Hamilton in the car. Hate him out of the car. No mate, he isn't. Not stating fact.

They are out there. In races they were closer, but vettel still clearly had the edge. So is this one.

Ferrari was faster. Hamilton beat Massa in a slower car. In addition, there was that whole Istanbul thing, but I actually pin that on Vettel.

Furthermore, even counting , it's still Hamilton 2, Vettel 3. But it was an extremely dominating season and an outlier, so no luck.

I want you to give me a name. That was actually a big factor that weekend The weather forecast for that weekend was for a bright Sunday, so every car, bar two, was fitted with the longer lasting Carbon Industries remember, brake wear is high here due to the high braking zone.

This means the Toro Rosso were able to brake later than all the other cars that used CI Yes, Vettel has gotten pole in a "fucking Toro Rosso", but it was not like he beaten his teammate into a submission.

Perhaps it's only under lockdown conditions, where almost nothing is actually possible, that even the impossible seems plausible.

Maybe our imaginations truly are running away with us, but could a battle royale the motorsport world has willed to happen for a decade come to pass?

Hamilton versus Vettel. Mano a mano. Same team. Same car. Gloves off. For one year. The more you allow yourself to even imagine it, the more sensational the prospect becomes.

It may be a long shot. Never before in F1 have we had the two leading championship protagonists of their day holding such success between them.

With 10 titles, Vettel and Hamilton have defined the past decade. Yet, like it or not, their time will — and must — come to an end.

And never could the reality of such a generational shift have been more apparent than the last 12 months in the life of Ferrari. The arrival and almost immediate accession of Charles Leclerc to de facto team leader resulted in a contract extension the length of which not even the mighty Michael Schumacher was afforded.

Or him and Hamilton as two, five-time champs. On his day, Vettel is still one of the very best. The competitive spark has not yet been snuffed out.

If the world at large has apparently written him off and supposedly judged his tenure at Ferrari as more indicative of his level than the four years that brought him world championship glory at Red Bull, what greater motivation could a sportsman have than a chance to, once and for all, prove the doubters wrong?

With little on the line, what harm could a box office line-up for the ages really do? Who is really on Renault's driver shopping list for ?

We know that in motor racing the first person anyone has to beat is their team mate. The same machinery is the only true barometer at this level where the stopwatch never lies.

And so the idea of having the drivers who have dominated their generation, driving for the team which has defined the hybrid era, takes root and blossoms.

And the more you allow yourself to even imagine it, the more sensational the prospect becomes. There seems little doubt that Lewis Hamilton will sign an extension to his tenure at Mercedes.

Who sits alongside him through what remains of his F1 career is therefore the only question at Mercedes. To move Vettel in would mean the team would have to slide Valtteri Bottas out.

Indeed, many would see it as a natural fit.

Vettel Vs Hamilton

WILDZ.COM Da PlayTech eine Multi Channel Beste Spielothek in Weildorf finden vorgeschlagen sind, sind Vettel Vs Hamilton.

HöCHSTES BLATT BEIM POKER 176
Beste Spielothek in Luftkurort Arendsee finden Mit der Titelvergabe hatte der Heppenheimer allerdings nichts zu tun. Da ist niemand zu beschuldigen. In beiden Fällen war aber nur ein Fahrer Weltmeister, der andere wurde es source zu einem späteren Zeitpunkt. Aktuelle Bildergalerien. McLaren 5.
Beste Spielothek in Meinsdorf finden 240
Vettel Vs Hamilton 121
Adventskalender Dragon 480
Vettel Vs Hamilton Zingo

Hamilton finishes behind all 3 other drivers with a possibility to win the WDC during the last racing, losing out to Webber, Alonso, and Vettel.

Notably in the McLaren that was second in the constructors championship. So you can't blame the cars. Pole positions Vettel wins the battle 9 to 1 , fastest laps Hamilton wins 5 to 3 , and on race wins Vettel comes out on top 5 to 3.

Vettel wins his second WDC in a completely dominant race car that won 12 out of 19 races. Vettel wins his 3rd WDC in a non-dominant season.

Seven different drivers won the first seven races. Red Bull only won 7 out of 20 races. Furthermore, only secure one single finish.

In race wins Vettel beats Hamilton 5 to 4. In Pole positions Hamilton beats Vettel 7 to 6. In fastest laps Vettel destroys Hamilton Vettel wins his 4th WDC in what is another extremely dominant car winning 13 of 19 races on the calendar, with four finishes.

Again, any time a constructor wins more than half of the races of the season it can easily be called dominant and a gimme title and we will not be including it here.

Because if the car is that good and you don't win? You're definitely not one of the best on the grid. You're expected to win and get nothing special for doing so.

Hamilton wins his 2nd WDC in a clearly dominant car even more so than any Red Bull that came before it. The Merc win 16 of 20 races, eleven of them finishes.

I'm sorry, but if you're Hamilton and you don't win a WDC in that situation you don't deserve your seat much less to be considered one of the best on the grid.

Furthermore, no one can honestly say Vettel was driving to his potential this year with everything going on around him. So it's not a year that can be considered genuinely reflective of his capabilities.

So no points can be awarded here for this meaning again, in seasons where some viable comparison can be made between Hamilton and Vettel it is still Hamilton wins his 3rd WDC championship in what is arguably the most dominant car in F1 history ever, already winning 14 out of just the 17 races already completed, with nine of them being finishes, and every pole position but 1 being secured by Mercedes.

But again, no conclusions can be drawn comparing the two during dominant seasons like this. There's just no way to tell who is better and nothing to point to in order to compare them.

The cars and competition are too unbalanced to even have any hope of a fair comparison. So in the end, after looking at every season they've both driven and by every data metric I can come up with Vettel has been better than Hamilton 3 times, where as Hamilton has only legitimately out done Vettel once.

Folks, Hamilton is a great driver and easily one of the best. But I had another poster challenge me on why folks rate Vettel above Hamilton.

So here you go. This is why I do. Just because you've won two championships in the most dominant car ever does not automatically mean YOU are the most dominant ever.

Just in the right place at the right time. So here goes, I suppose. RIP my inbox. And good luck to all as the Hamilton hounds are released to decry and proclaim how none of these viable metrics matter and that Hamilton is the second coming of Ayrton Senna and the greatest driver on the grid.

Despite the solid reasoning, data, and results put forth here. Huge Vettel fan here, but should be counted on Hamilton.

Vettel struggled yes, and the fact he wasn't able to beat Ricciardo already makes Hamilton the winner of that season. We can have our own biases but really was a fucked up year for Vettel.

I find there is no excuses for Vettel to not have beaten Ricciardo that year. That said, I do agree you with a personal bias that one year does not automatically assume Vettel sucks.

Now, is Vettel the best? I would like to think so, yes. But Hamilton is also a one of a kind talent.

The dude is obviously quick, and has the ruthlessness needed in racing. It would really be interesting if Ferrari can match the pace of Mercedes and have a Vettel vs Hamilton battle for the championship.

Regardless of who wins though, I would still support Seb until he does something incredibly disappointing and stupid.

Of course, the reason why I like Vettel is not because he is the best, but because I like him as a dude and want to be like him if I was a Formula 1 driver.

IMO, we should just all stop focusing and worshiping who is the best and focus on supporting the driver we like just because we like them.

We all aspire to be someone hence we look up to heroes. If you prefer the high-roller rags-to-riches lifestyle Lewis, then so be it.

A lot of Brits prefer a gent like Jenson. And of course, there is a huge population that likes the tenacity and passion of Nando. Great summary, you really hit the nail on its head!

Both drivers are amazing, but in the end there's so much more deciding who we like. Personally you're correct button is our preferred choice.

And I think button is honestly the better driver than Hamilton. Think of them like senna and prost. Hamilton is aggressive and fast.

Jenson calm collected smooth and fast. Granted he has had the championship after he joined McLaren right up till But he consistently beat Lewis throughout the season.

So I don't think we should count Jenson out. Along with this Alonso beat Schumacher Michael Schumacher the best driver on record in formula 1 history in what can be described for and inferior car.

And and 14 when he was driving the wheels off the Ferrari making it do things Mazda couldn't.

You can't take away that he is probably the best driver on the grid. I definitely rate him highly like vettel. There are a lot of factors to rate drivers and unfortunately most go on numbers.

James hunt one championship. But he in my opinion is what can be described as a great. Because of his personality and his attitude.

We need characters like hunt in f1. Vettel this season is showing his true character this season of how happy he is. And that's reflected in his driving.

So yes. I will agree with you that vettel is one of the best. But he is not deffinitively THE best. The and red bulls were equally dominant in my opinion.

Vettel drove a good season in but he started slow, only winning 1 out of the first 13 races. I think mclaren had the fastest car that year but kept shooting themselves in the foot.

Hamilton though was flawless. I would say is a tie between them. Webber was heavily injured that year don't forget. Even so, Vettel's pace advantage over him was minimal.

Webber was limping at the first race. In qualifying absolutely. But in races they were remarkably close in , which considering Webber likely had lasting injuries wasn't super strong.

I think qualifying specialist is an overused term. Webber thrahsed Coulthard over one lap, Vettel thrashed Webber, but then Ricciardo came and comfortably beat Vettel.

It seems to be the guys with weak team mates get the label. Jarno Trulli is the most obvious example I can think of. He very often put midfield cars towards the front of the grid.

And then sank back down through the field during the race as surely as a boulder in quicksand. No coincidence the only race he ever won is the one where passing is impossible.

Yeah absolutely. I'm not sure you analyzed it that carefully, I did, but in Vettel's strength was that he could throw together optimal laps on his final run, while even Ricciardo struggled to do it.

Say Vettel's 3 best sectors together from all his qualifying runs added up to He'd often run say a On some of the days Vettel beat him his optimal may have say been We've never really seen Vettel against another strong qualifier to analyze that, but I found it pretty interesting.

Because I think on sector times Ricciardo was stronger, nearly every session, but Vettel's ability to throw together his best three sectors on the final lap really made them pretty even overall.

Your attitude is a bit cringeworthy. You take pains to preemptively inform us that the only opposition to your flawless quantitative analysis could come from irrational Hamilton worshippers.

You can virtually feel the smugness leaking out every time you award Vettel a point. Why couldn't you have just stuck to the core analysis and let the discussion develop?

Why'd you have to attack people who might disagree with you in advance? Do you not think your reasoning is robust enough to stand on its own?

This is probably the most complex, yet rightfully downvoted post I've ever seen on reddit as a whole.

Thumbs up for taking effort to write that down, but I can't help, it's load of bs. Let's just settle it down by saying that we both like Vettel.

No need to justify your fandom towards driver by saying that he's the best. Red Bull took all but 3 pole positions, and Vettel nearly lost to Webber.

It should have been a 2 horse race between the RBR drivers like was for Mercedes. Enough to have won the WDC. It's almost like there's never been a year where they could be compared apples to apples, so you're just pulling bullshit out of your ass and cherry picking facts to support your favorite driver.

They're obviously 2 of the 3 best drivers on the grid, and until they wind up as teammates or truly get a straight fight, we'll never know who is truly best.

This is a really late reply, but it's worth noting in that Vettel retired in the first two races which would have been wins for him since he retired from 1st in both - so that's 50 points he lost to Webber.

Vettel killed Webber in quali that year and with more race luck would have wrapped the title up much easier. This is some of the best and most enthusiastic trolling I've seen here in quite some time.

Well done. Also, don't most people consider Hamilton and Alonso the best two drivers? Shouldn't the title be "Why I consider Vettel a better driver than Hamilton"?

Lmfao why didnt you count ? Im sorry but Hamilton definitely performed better than Vettel that year and it should be counted towards something.

Because Vettel clearly wasn't performing up to his capabilities and the Merc was entirely dominant. Any season where the construct won more than half of the races is counted out.

I could easily say that in and Vettel clearly out drove Hamilton. But I didn't. Because no viable comparison could be draw under than circumstance.

Then count it. People not counting years where drivers fucked up irritates me. Hamilton's should not be forgotten nor should Vettel and Kimi's Surely it wasn't Vettel's fault he was beaten by Dan in his first season at the team where Seb had previously won 4 straight championships ;.

It was left out because it was a dominant season. Like all the other dominant seasons in the list, fairly. Because Vettel clearly wasn't performing up to his capabilities and the Merc was.

Maurice Hamilton has a great article on the Italian Grand Prix in the F1 Racing magazine I lost my copy, if there is someone out there that still has a copy, can you post that article here please.

Toro Rosso did a test day on that track in August, so they are well prepared compared to the other teams come race weekend. That was actually a big factor that weekend.

The weather forecast for that weekend was for a bright Sunday, so every car, bar two, was fitted with the longer lasting Carbon Industries remember, brake wear is high here due to the high braking zone.

The other two car that used Brembo? Both Toro Rosso. Brembo heated faster and retain heat better, so they were much more well suited for the heavy rain.

This means the Toro Rosso were able to brake later than all the other cars that used CI. Yes, Vettel has gotten pole in a "fucking Toro Rosso", but it was not like he beaten his teammate into a submission.

Bourdais was a close fourth, he missed his window and did his fastest lap in a worsening rain. At the start of the race, Bourdais stalled oops and was a lap down by the time he got started.

He would have easily gotten 2nd if not for this. Vettel was fast and all due to his confidence in the car and brakes, but there was another car that was as fast as him that day that did not use Brembo.

It was the McLaren of Lewis Hamilton. Also don't forget that Vettel was using a dry setup in qualifying and the race while mostly everyone behind him was on a wet setup.

The other factor is that at the time, Red Bull were exploiting a rules loophole that allowed Newey to work for a "consulting" firm they set up and "sell" both teams the design.

The and Red Bull and Toro Rosso were functionally identical cars except for the engines. Sure, neither was world-beating at the time, and winning in one was still an upset and an impressive feat, but it's not like now where Red Bull has all the advantages and STR is something of a minnow team.

Even as a Vettel fan I think this is completely useless. You can't really know who's definitively better than the other unless you somehow get both of them in an amazing car for maybe 3 seasons or so.

Not really, you need both team mates to adapt to the current regulations and the team equally. One might be better at quickly changing racing style, but ultimately isn't as good a racer when both settle.

Or someone may struggle with a new team routine ect. At the end of last year Hamilton and Rosberg were considered somewhat equally, now?

Much less so. One season is good, three seasons and a rule change is much much better. One year is enough.

The margin between Nico and Lewis wasnt big - therefore, for Nico and Lewis - one year isnt enough. You dont need another year to see if Vettel is better than Kimi.

This years margin is big enough. We don't need another season for Kimi because he has been consistently beaten for the last few years by Fernando.

However he could be equal and just had a crappy year otherwise. Are you telling me you got consistent grades every year in School?

Shit happens. You can't really compare them. All of whom are considered very strong drivers. Vettel has avoided comparison to top drivers in identical machinery and flat out got beaten by the strongest driver he's ever faced.

This is the best response to this Vettel fanboy. Vettel will probably not face a strong teammate for a long time since he's at Ferrari.

Again, the claim of besting Alonso is shaky. Good on him for tying Alonso who's an awesome driver and one of the best on the grid. Button and Rosberg, while great drivers, is a bit like using Vettel besting Webber or Bourdais as some large achievement.

Good, but not spectactular to have done so. The thing is Hamilton has been compared against the best on the grid. Vettel has had average drivers and the one time he faced a strong driver he got thrashed.

I like both of them. I hated Vettel when his car was clearly better than everyone else's, and everyone said he's the best driver of all time.

He's had an amazing season and has been so much fun to watch. And now I'm bored of watching Hamilton win, even though I was so bummed that his Mclaren and the team let him down so many times over the years.

Both are great drivers and are great at different things. Neither is better in every aspect.

Even if they were on the same team, and one was faster, you couldn't say conclusively he's better.

Maybe some day we'll see it. Last year Vettel looked pretty weak compared to Ricciardo. Nobody's ever made Hamilton look weak.

Even the years where Button beat or came close to him, Hamilton had epic failures from his team again and again. How can you think Vettel didn't perform better than Hamilton in easily Hamilton's worst season or that Hamilton performed better than Vettel in easily Vettel's worst?

Anyway, I don't understand this fixation with determining who is the outright best driver through extremely dubious analyses such as this.

Just get over the fact that you won't have a definitive answer unless they are teammates. But don't you see? Ignoring both of those seasons due to dominance equals out exactly like counting the.

Under your metric does. You only have to look at Alonso tooling around at the back right now to get that, but those gulfs aren't always so obvious if you're not looking carefully enough - take , where Massa and Raikkonen ran close to Alonso, but they've both been in the same car as him and But the other big problem with this is that you write like you started with a conclusion and sought to justify it.

For example:. Yet the previous year, Kimi Raikkonen beat Fernando Alonso to the championship by one point. I don't hear you saying "that's right, folks.

Why not? That's just one place where the analysis gives way to opinion - and is subjugated by it, in fact, as it willfully ignores the similarity to the previous year.

Given such an example though, the reader wonders if you similarly interpret all the data in a way that's favourable to your opinion, and feels they might be justified in discarding the entire analysis.

No, I'm sorry, what you said about was wrong. Lewis had the best season of any rookie, ever, and regardless of how shit Seb's car was, you can't safely assume he'd perform as well.

As a matter of fact, I think Kamui Kobayashi had a better than Vettel, he was just in a worse car, so there is no fair comparison.

Vettel didn't even drive the whole season and their cars were leagues apart so no viable comparison could be made between them.

Hamilton did have a great rookie year, no doubt. But this isn't about who had the best rookie year and there was no way to compare their performance fairly that year.

And is not counted toward anything for Vettel. So not sure where you even get the Kamui comparison. Vettel dominated that year and you'd say Kamui had a better run?

Bottas puts Hamilton on the back foot as Ferrari flops. Why some F1 drivers may opt against taking a knee at Austrian Grand Prix.

Mercedes' DAS system: What is it? And is it a game-changer? Everything that happened since F1's last race. Hamilton escapes grid penalty at Austrian Grand Prix after yellow flag incident.

Hamilton dismisses Mercedes contract speculation, says negotiations yet to begin. Pandemic sealed Vettel's departure, says Ferrari boss.

Hamilton to race with Black Lives Matter tribute helmet in Vettel 'surprised' by Ferrari decision, says he was not offered new deal.

Kimi says his son is already quick in go-karts. What happens if an F1 driver tests positive for coronavirus? Advantage Verstappen?

How F1's revised schedule might impact the championship. Testing recap: Ranking the grid ahead of the season opener.

How racing will look under F1's new normal. F1 announces dates for return to racing. TV schedule.

Mercedes unveils all-black livery as part of anti-racism stance. F1 launches initiative against racism, inequality.

Vettel 6. Haas F1 Team 28 Schumacher vs. Wolfgang Wilhelm. Formel Run Panda Bottas auf Pole. Hier kommt der Gebrauchtwagen-Test. VW T7 Multivan : Neuvorstellung. Motorsport-Total Business Club. Lackschäden reparieren Alles wieder im Lack Eine Autolackierung ist teuer, dabei lassen sich kleine Lackschäden mit etwas Geschick auch selbst beheben. Auch durch dessen Ausritt? Valtteri Bottas go here sich trotz eines Abflugs die Pole Position. In der zweiten Schikane kam es zur Detonation. F1-Tests: Zeiten, Termine, Statistiken. Dass ein Weltmeister sich einem Fahrer im https://awesomewalls.co/casino-royal-online-anschauen/beste-spielothek-in-gaxel-finden.php Team stellen musste, der später ebenfalls mal Champion werden würde, passierte sehr oft: 29 Mal! No one in the season thought the ferrari was substantially faster Option Tutorial Iq the mclaren. Of course, the reason why Https://awesomewalls.co/usa-online-casino/lol-angebote-dezember-2020.php like Vettel is not because he is the best, but because I like him as a dude and want to be like him if I was a Formula 1 driver. When Hamilton eventually pitted on lap 25, he emerged in fourth afterwards behind them all. We did not get Handel Mit Optionen. Lewis Hamilton Drivers to discuss taking a knee - Hamilton The gesture has become symbolic in the fight against racism 4 comments. Agree even Stefano and Brawn came out saying that the Ferrari was the better car at the start of the season and the Lotus just click for source best at preserving it's tyres. He's had an amazing season and has been so much fun to watch.

Vettel Vs Hamilton Nummer-eins-Status muss jedes Wochenende verdient werden

Zur Mobilansicht. Stefan Baldauf. Click here Kommentare Noch kein Kommentar vorhanden! Dass ein Weltmeister sich einem Fahrer im eigenen Team stellen musste, der später ebenfalls mal Champion werden würde, passierte sehr oft: 29 Mal! Gebrauchtwagen finden. Los geht's! Wir waren Rivalen.

0 Replies to “Vettel Vs Hamilton“

Hinterlasse eine Antwort

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind markiert *